The following e-mail is reproduced with permission of Justin Giles-Clark VK7TW.
----Original
Message-----
From: Justin Giles-Clark <********@*********.com.au>
Sent: Thursday, 13 May 2004 11:51 PM
To: "Hartwig, Geoff" <**********@****.gov.au>
Subject: BPL Trial in Hobart
Greetings Geoff,
Members from the Southern Branch of the Tasmanian Division of
the Wireless Institute of Australia met with Piero Peroni and
Adrian Wild from Aurora Energy to discuss their trial of
BPL/PLC in the Hobart CBD and Piero passed on your contact
details.
At the meeting a presentation about the trial was given by
Piero and Adrian and after the presentation we were able to
have an open, frank and positive discussion where we expressed
our concern about BPL technology and Aurora expressed their
reasons for trialling the technology. Aurora was happy to keep
us informed about developments, futures trials, etc.
We also expressed our disappointment in the limited
underground trial and they acknowledged these limitations and
that this trial is not the decision maker for their BPL
business case. They outlined during the presentation that they
are also investigating wireless technologies and fibre optics
as strategies for delivering the last mile of broadband to
consumer and have not made their mind up on any of them as
yet.
We were fortunate to have Barry McCann from the Coast Radio
Hobart in attendance. Barry runs the HF marine frequency (2,
4, 6, 8 MHz) emergency monitoring station down here in Tassie.
He expressed his concern about interference and the possible
raising of the noise floor with the wider introduction of BPL.
They passed on some helpful presentations from an
international conference they recently attended on PLC as well
as the presentation they gave. We also gave them an audible
demonstration of the interference from a portable HF receiver.
We are hoping to try and arrange a meeting with the Mitsubishi
engineers to further discuss the technology and what it's
capability and configurability is in relation to notching out
particular frequencies and Piero steered us in your direction
to see if we could be involved in some way when the engineers
return?
I look forward to hearing from you.
Regards
----------------------------------------
73 de VK7TW Justin Giles-Clark
Southern Branch President
Tasmanian Division of the
Wireless Institute of Australia
http://www.wia.org.au/vk7/
And
now the reply from the ACA!!!!!!!!!
Webmasters Comments (in Italics)
Please Note: The following is NOT a personal attack on the writer from the ACA but rather a comment on current Australian government policy on BPL (Broadband over Power Lines) and its effects on HF (Shortwave) radio reception!
Government spin doctoring at it's worst. What the e-mail really means to say is "We want people to Download Porn, Pirated DVD's, Pirated Software and Pirated Music quicker!!", and don't forget the Broadband targeted e-mail spam which have 1 megabyte sized messages for your reading pleasure! What else is BPL used for? If you claim "Video Conferencing" or "Medical Consultations" these have been going on for years via coaxial cable; fibre optic and satellite well before BPL was dreamed up by some idiot who could not care less that HF (Shortwave) radio reception would be ruined!
If you don't believe HF (Shortwave) radio reception will be ruined, please listen to these actual BPL samples, please click here, here, here, here, here, here, here or for the Hobart BPL test here!! (114 Kb wav).
As far as broadcasting is concerned, you have to be joking! I can buy a $AUD200 portable HF (Shortwave) radio receiver and listen to international broadcasts for FREE in the evening, listening in my arm chair. Just who will guarantee that in the future; you will not need a password and credit card to listen to Internet broadcasts.
With a computer you have to buy one that's capable of handling broadband ($AUD1500- $2000+); subscribe to a Broadband service (the $AUD29.95 monthly plans do not have the download capacity for Broadcasting) so you are looking at $AUD50 a month or more; then to top if off you have to worry if your download limit is reached so you''ll either be cut off or your speed cut back to 28.8 Kb. Remember download limits include everything including your e-mails (including spam) and viewing Web Pages.
And of course how can we not forget the infamous Internet "slow-downs" when there is a spam-run or a virus attack on many popular web sites!
CRAP!!! I'll translate this bureaucratic double-speak! No one has ever asked me if I ever wanted BPL nor has any one asked me if I want the Power Companies to supply the Internet when they should be supplying power. Just who is really driving this BPL push, certainly not anyone that I know requires broadband via the power lines!!!!
I believe BPL is being pushed to people who have little idea of computers and the Internet. They are sold BPL solely on the aspect of its fast speed, when all they REALLY want to do is look for information on the Internet.
A 56Kb dial-up connection via the telephone line is perfectly adequate for this and certainly much cheaper. They do not realise that a permanent BPL connection is more likely to be "hacked" than a dial-up as it's "IP" address does not change.
I am not a computer luddite and have computing qualifications, I've had a computer since 1984 and I've been on-line since 1992. At first using Fidonet (an e-mail and file download system that was popular before the Internet took hold) with a 2400 Kb modem, and then in 1995 I started to use a 14400 Modem.
In 1997 I went to a 28.8 Kb modem which I am still using now, this modem works perfectly and I can download files, e-mail messages and view usenet newsgroups as well as browse the World Wide Web at a good speed.
The Internet does not require a fast connection of broadband (especially via BPL) to be enjoyed. For example one of the most popular sites in Australia is the Bureau of Meteorology. This site does not require a broadband connection to be viewed successfully.
Back to